Active Filters

  • (-) Eawag Authors = Leifeld, Philip
  • (-) Keywords ≠ collaboration
Search Results 1 - 12 of 12
  • RSS Feed
Select Page
Networks and social influence in European legislative politics
Malang, T., Brandenberger, L., & Leifeld, P. (2018). Networks and social influence in European legislative politics. British Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 1475-1498. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000217
Navigating the range of statistical tools for inferential network analysis
Cranmer, S. J., Leifeld, P., McClurg, S. D., & Rolfe, M. (2017). Navigating the range of statistical tools for inferential network analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 237-251. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12263
Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network
Leifeld, P., Wankmüller, S., Berger, V. T. Z., Ingold, K., & Steiner, C. (2017). Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network. PLoS One, 12(4), e0174671 (35 pp.). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174671
Discourse network analysis: policy debates as dynamic networks
Leifeld, P. (2017). Discourse network analysis: policy debates as dynamic networks. In J. N. Victor, A. H. Montgomery, & M. Lubell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political networks (pp. 301-326). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190228217.013.25
Policy debates as dynamic networks. German pension politics and privatization discourse
Leifeld, P. (2016). Policy debates as dynamic networks. German pension politics and privatization discourse. Studies in social policy research: Vol. 29.
Do direct-democratic procedures lead to higher acceptance than political representation? Experimental survey evidence from Germany
Towfigh, E. V., Goerg, S. J., Glöckner, A., Leifeld, P., Llorente-Saguer, A., Bade, S., & Kurschilgen, C. (2016). Do direct-democratic procedures lead to higher acceptance than political representation? Experimental survey evidence from Germany. Public Choice, 167, 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0330-y
Policy forums: Why do they exist and what are they used for?
Fischer, M., & Leifeld, P. (2015). Policy forums: Why do they exist and what are they used for? Policy Sciences, 48(3), 363-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9224-y
Structural and institutional determinants of influence reputation: a comparison of collaborative and adversarial policy networks in decision making and implementation
Ingold, K., & Leifeld, P. (2014). Structural and institutional determinants of influence reputation: a comparison of collaborative and adversarial policy networks in decision making and implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu043
Mapping the ideological networks of American climate politics
Fisher, D. R., Leifeld, P., & Iwaki, Y. (2013). Mapping the ideological networks of American climate politics. Climatic Change, 116, 523-545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0512-7
Where does political polarization come from? Locating polarization within the U.S. climate change debate
Fisher, D. R., Waggle, J., & Leifeld, P. (2013). Where does political polarization come from? Locating polarization within the U.S. climate change debate. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(1), 70-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212463360
Reconceptualizing major policy change in the advocacy coalition framework: a discourse network analysis of German pension politics
Leifeld, P. (2013). Reconceptualizing major policy change in the advocacy coalition framework: a discourse network analysis of German pension politics. Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), 169-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12007
Coping with creeping catastrophes. National political systems and the challenge of slow-moving policy problems
Schneider, V., Leifeld, P., & Malang, T. (2013). Coping with creeping catastrophes. National political systems and the challenge of slow-moving policy problems. In B. Siebenhüner, M. Arnold, K. Eisenack, & K. Jacob (Eds.), Routledge research in environmental politics: Vol. 21. Long-term governance for social-ecological change (pp. 221-238).