Active Filters

  • (-) Keywords = bioassessment
Search Results 1 - 14 of 14
  • CSV Spreadsheet
  • Excel Spreadsheet
  • RSS Feed
Select Page
Environmental DNA: What's behind the term? Clarifying the terminology and recommendations for its future use in biomonitoring
Pawlowski, J., Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil, L., & Altermatt, F. (2020). Environmental DNA: What's behind the term? Clarifying the terminology and recommendations for its future use in biomonitoring. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15643
Towards a simple global-standard bioassay for a key ecosystem process: organic-matter decomposition using cotton strips
Colas, F., Woodward, G., Burdon, F. J., Guérold, F., Chauvet, E., Cornut, J., … Tiegs, S. D. (2019). Towards a simple global-standard bioassay for a key ecosystem process: organic-matter decomposition using cotton strips. Ecological Indicators, 106, 105466 (9 pp.). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105466
Sub-basin and temporal variability of macroinvertebrate assemblages in Alpine streams: when and where to sample?
Gabbud, C., Robinson, C. T., & Lane, S. N. (2019). Sub-basin and temporal variability of macroinvertebrate assemblages in Alpine streams: when and where to sample? Hydrobiologia, 830(1), 179-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-018-3862-y
A comparison of biotic groups as dry-phase indicators of ecological quality in intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams
Stubbington, R., Paillex, A., England, J., Barthès, A., Bouchez, A., Rimet, F., … Datry, T. (2019). A comparison of biotic groups as dry-phase indicators of ecological quality in intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams. Ecological Indicators, 97, 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.09.061
The future of biotic indices in the ecogenomic era: integrating (e)DNA metabarcoding in biological assessment of aquatic ecosystems
Pawlowski, J., Kelly-Quinn, M., Altermatt, F., Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil, L., Beja, P., Boggero, A., … Kahlert, M. (2018). The future of biotic indices in the ecogenomic era: integrating (e)DNA metabarcoding in biological assessment of aquatic ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment, 637-638, 1295-1310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.002
How stressor specific are trait-based ecological indices for ecosystem management?
Schuwirth, N., Kattwinkel, M., & Stamm, C. (2015). How stressor specific are trait-based ecological indices for ecosystem management? Science of the Total Environment, 505, 565-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.029
How to make river assessments comparable: a demonstration for hydromorphology
Langhans, S. D., Lienert, J., Schuwirth, N., & Reichert, P. (2013). How to make river assessments comparable: a demonstration for hydromorphology. Ecological Indicators, 32, 264-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.027
Use of protected areas for freshwater biomonitoring – case studies in Switzerland
Robinson, C. T., Doering, M., & Seelen, L. (2011). Use of protected areas for freshwater biomonitoring – case studies in Switzerland. eco.mont, 3(2), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1553/eco.mont-3-2s13
Litter decomposition across multiple spatial scales in stream networks
Tiegs, S. D., Akinwole, P. O., & Gessner, M. O. (2009). Litter decomposition across multiple spatial scales in stream networks. Oecologia, 161(2), 343-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1386-x
Cotton strips as a leaf surrogate to measure decomposition in river floodplain habitats
Tiegs, S. D., Langhans, S. D., Tockner, K., & Gessner, M. O. (2007). Cotton strips as a leaf surrogate to measure decomposition in river floodplain habitats. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 26(1), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.1899/0887-3593(2007)26[70:CSAALS]2.0.CO;2
A strategy to assess river restoration success
Woolsey, S., Capelli, F., Gonser, T., Hoehn, E., Hostmann, M., Junker, B., … Peter, A. (2007). A strategy to assess river restoration success. Freshwater Biology, 52(4), 752-769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01740.x
Impacts of stream acidification on litter breakdown: implications for assessing ecosystem functioning
Dangles, O., Gessner, M. O., Guerold, F., & Chauvet, E. (2004). Impacts of stream acidification on litter breakdown: implications for assessing ecosystem functioning. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41(2), 365-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00888.x
A case for using litter breakdown to assess functional stream integrity
Gessner, M. O., & Chauvet, E. (2002). A case for using litter breakdown to assess functional stream integrity. Ecological Applications, 12(2), 498-510. https://doi.org/10.2307/3060958
Regional assessment of wadable streams in Idaho, USA
Robinson, C. T., & Minshall, G. W. (1998). Regional assessment of wadable streams in Idaho, USA. Great Basin Naturalist, 58(1), 54-65.