Active Filters

  • (-) Keywords = stakeholders
Search Results 1 - 8 of 8
  • RSS Feed
Select Page
Actor roles and networks in implementing urban water innovation: a study of onsite water reuse in the San Francisco Bay Area
Wagner, T. R., Nelson, K. L., Binz, C., & Hacker, M. E. (2023). Actor roles and networks in implementing urban water innovation: a study of onsite water reuse in the San Francisco Bay Area. Environmental Science and Technology, 57(15), 6205-6215. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c05231
Ecotoxicological testing of sediments and dredged material: an overlooked opportunity?
Heise, S., Babut, M., Casado, C., Feiler, U., Ferrari, B. J. D., & Marziali, L. (2020). Ecotoxicological testing of sediments and dredged material: an overlooked opportunity? Journal of Soils and Sediments, 20(12), 4218-4228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02798-7
Differences in stakeholders' and end users' preferences of arsenic mitigation options in Bangladesh
Hossain, M. M., & Inauen, J. (2014). Differences in stakeholders' and end users' preferences of arsenic mitigation options in Bangladesh. Journal of Public Health (Berlin, Heidelberg), 22(4), 335-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-014-0625-8
Application of the Multi-Attribute Value Theory for engaging stakeholders in groundwater protection in the Vosvozis catchment in Greece
Stefanopoulos, K., Yang, H., Gemitzi, A., & Tsagarakis, K. P. (2014). Application of the Multi-Attribute Value Theory for engaging stakeholders in groundwater protection in the Vosvozis catchment in Greece. Science of the Total Environment, 470-471, 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.008
Addressing stakeholder concerns using the Integrative River Rehabilitation Model (IRRM)
Borsuk, M. E., Schweizer, S., & Reichert, P. (2008). Addressing stakeholder concerns using the Integrative River Rehabilitation Model (IRRM). In M. Sànchez-Marrè, J. Béjar, J. Comas, A. Rizzoli, & G. Guariso (Eds.), Vol. 2. Integrating sciences and information technology for environmental assessment and decision making. 4th biennial meeting of iEMSs (pp. 842-849).
Identifying the institutional decision process to introduce decentralized sanitation in the city of Kunming (China)
Medilanski, E., Chuan, L., Mosler, H. J., Schertenleib, R., & Larsen, T. A. (2007). Identifying the institutional decision process to introduce decentralized sanitation in the city of Kunming (China). Environmental Management, 39(5), 648-662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0321-0
Wastewater management in Kunming, China: a stakeholder perspective on measures at the source
Medilanski, E., Chuan, L., Mosler, H. J., Schertenleib, R., & Larsen, T. A. (2006). Wastewater management in Kunming, China: a stakeholder perspective on measures at the source. Environment and Urbanization, 18(2), 353-368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247806069615
Societal implications of re-engineering the toilet
Larsen, T. A., & Lienert, J. (2003). Societal implications of re-engineering the toilet. In Water intelligence online. Sustainability in the water sector (p. (15 pp.). IWA Publishing.