Active Filters

  • (-) Keywords = stakeholders
Search Results 1 - 5 of 5
  • CSV Spreadsheet
  • Excel Spreadsheet
  • RSS Feed
Select Page
Differences in stakeholders' and end users' preferences of arsenic mitigation options in Bangladesh
Hossain, M. M., & Inauen, J. (2014). Differences in stakeholders' and end users' preferences of arsenic mitigation options in Bangladesh. Journal of Public Health (Berlin, Heidelberg), 22(4), 335-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-014-0625-8
Application of the Multi-Attribute Value Theory for engaging stakeholders in groundwater protection in the Vosvozis catchment in Greece
Stefanopoulos, K., Yang, H., Gemitzi, A., & Tsagarakis, K. P. (2014). Application of the Multi-Attribute Value Theory for engaging stakeholders in groundwater protection in the Vosvozis catchment in Greece. Science of the Total Environment, 470-471, 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.008
Identifying the institutional decision process to introduce decentralized sanitation in the city of Kunming (China)
Medilanski, E., Chuan, L., Mosler, H. J., Schertenleib, R., & Larsen, T. A. (2007). Identifying the institutional decision process to introduce decentralized sanitation in the city of Kunming (China). Environmental Management, 39(5), 648-662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0321-0
Wastewater management in Kunming, China: a stakeholder perspective on measures at the source
Medilanski, E., Chuan, L., Mosler, H. J., Schertenleib, R., & Larsen, T. A. (2006). Wastewater management in Kunming, China: a stakeholder perspective on measures at the source. Environment and Urbanization, 18(2), 353-368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247806069615
Societal implications of re-engineering the toilet
Larsen, T. A., & Lienert, J. (2003). Societal implications of re-engineering the toilet. Water Intelligence Online, 1-15.