Active Filters

  • (-) Keywords = willingness to pay
  • (-) Keywords ≠ rural
Search Results 1 - 5 of 5
  • RSS Feed
Select Page
Do the societal benefits of river restoration outweigh their costs? A cost-benefit analysis
Logar, I., Brouwer, R., & Paillex, A. (2019). Do the societal benefits of river restoration outweigh their costs? A cost-benefit analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 232, 1075-1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.098
Welfare values of sustained urban water flows for recreational and cultural amenities under climate change
Nikouei, A., & Brouwer, R. (2017). Welfare values of sustained urban water flows for recreational and cultural amenities under climate change. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 8(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2016.119
Differences in stakeholders' and end users' preferences of arsenic mitigation options in Bangladesh
Hossain, M. M., & Inauen, J. (2014). Differences in stakeholders' and end users' preferences of arsenic mitigation options in Bangladesh. Journal of Public Health (Berlin, Heidelberg), 22(4), 335-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-014-0625-8
Household's willingness to pay for arsenic safe drinking water in Bangladesh
Khan, N. I., Brouwer, R., & Yang, H. (2014). Household's willingness to pay for arsenic safe drinking water in Bangladesh. Journal of Environmental Management, 143, 151-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.04.018
Climate change and the willingness to pay to reduce ecological and health risks from wastewater flooding in urban centers and the environment
Veronesi, M., Chawla, F., Maurer, M., & Lienert, J. (2014). Climate change and the willingness to pay to reduce ecological and health risks from wastewater flooding in urban centers and the environment. Ecological Economics, 98, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.005