Over the last decades, several methods have been developed for determining the porewater stable isotope composition (δ²H, δ¹⁸O) in low-permeability, argillaceous rocks and pertinent to the acquisition of spatially highly-resolved tracer profiles for investigating subsurface transport processes over large scales of time and space. One of these methods is the so-called isotope diffusive exchange technique (IDE) where the porewater of the rock equilibrates via the vapour phase with a test water of known isotope composition. In this study we aim for 1) identifying and assessing important parameters and artefacts these experiments are sensitive and prone to, respectively, 2) evaluating their impact on the porewater isotope composition derived from such experiments and 3) testing the reproducibility and accuracy of the method. For this, the experimental data and the calculated porewater isotope composition of 752 isotope diffusive exchange experiments, performed on drillcore samples from variable lithologies, were examined under these aspects. The investigations are complemented by comparison between porewater and groundwater isotope values in regions of water-conducting zones and an interlaboratory comparison. Ultimately, this allowed defining a stringent procedure for the evaluation of the experimental data and classifying experiments as ‘reliable’, less reliable’ and ‘failed’. For calculating the porewater isotope composition, a new approach was developed that accounts for sample-scale heterogeneity of the water content. This procedure of data evaluation and processing resulted in smooth isotope profiles with only little scatter across largely different lithologies. The interlaboratory comparison attests the method a very good reproducibility. The comparison with groundwater isotope data reveals slightly enriched δ¹⁸O and δ²H signatures by 0.3–0.6 and 1.7–2.7‰ VSMOW, respectively, for some samples investigated by the IDE method. No stringent explanation exists at this stage for these differences, but it must be emphasized that these deviations are small compared to the typical natural variations observed in profiles of these tracers. This demonstrates that porewater isotope data obtained by the IDE method represent the conditions in the in situ porewater reasonably well when strictly following the proposed procedures of the experimental setup, the evaluation of experimental data and the calculation of porewater isotope compositions.