Active Filters

  • (-) Keywords = Monte Carlo simulation
Search Results 1 - 20 of 31
Select Page
A segmented total energy detector (sTED) optimized for (n, <em>γ</em>) cross-section measurements at n_TOF EAR2
Alcayne, V., Cano-Ott, D., Garcia, J., González-Romero, E., Martínez, T., Rada, A. P., … Žugec, P. (2024). A segmented total energy detector (sTED) optimized for (n, γ) cross-section measurements at n_TOF EAR2. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 217, 111525 (11 pp.). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.111525
Validation of IAEA electron beam data for radiotherapy and their use to model total skin irradiation
Chauvie, S., Boccacci, P., D'Agostino, D., Gambaro, M., Grillo Ruggieri, F., Pia, M. G., … Schiapparelli, P. (2022). Validation of IAEA electron beam data for radiotherapy and their use to model total skin irradiation. In 2022 IEEE NSS/MIC RTSD - IEEE nuclear science symposium, medical imaging conference and room temperature semiconductor detector conference. IEEE nuclear science symposium, medical imaging conference, and room temperature semiconductor detector conference (pp. 1-4). https://doi.org/10.1109/NSS/MIC44845.2022.10399289
Long-term solar photovoltaics penetration in single- and two-family houses in Switzerland
Panos, E., & Margelou, S. (2019). Long-term solar photovoltaics penetration in single- and two-family houses in Switzerland. Energies, 12(13), 2460 (33 pp.). https://doi.org/10.3390/en12132460
Evaluation of the ray-casting analytical algorithm for pencil beam scanning proton therapy
Winterhalter, C., Zepter, S., Shim, S., Meier, G., Bolsi, A., Fredh, A., … Safai, S. (2019). Evaluation of the ray-casting analytical algorithm for pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 64(6), 065021 (15 pp.). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aafe58
Log file based Monte Carlo calculations for proton pencil beam scanning therapy
Winterhalter, C., Meier, G., Oxley, D., Weber, D. C., Lomax, A. J., & Safai, S. (2019). Log file based Monte Carlo calculations for proton pencil beam scanning therapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 64(3), 035014 (9 pp.). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aaf82d
A comparison of dynamic event tree methods - case study on a chemical batch reactor
Karanki, D. R., Dang, V. N., MacMillan, M. T., & Podofillini, L. (2018). A comparison of dynamic event tree methods - case study on a chemical batch reactor. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 169, 542-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.10.003
In-orbit instrument performance study and calibration for POLAR polarization measurements
Li, Z., Kole, M., Sun, J., Song, L., Produit, N., Wu, B., … Zhao, Y. (2018). In-orbit instrument performance study and calibration for POLAR polarization measurements. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 900, 8-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2018.05.041
Correction of geometrical effects of a knife-edge slit camera for prompt gamma-based range verification in proton therapy
Petzoldt, J., Janssens, G., Nenoff, L., Richter, C., & Smeets, J. (2018). Correction of geometrical effects of a knife-edge slit camera for prompt gamma-based range verification in proton therapy. Instruments, 2(4), 25 (12 pp.). https://doi.org/10.3390/instruments2040025
Deterministic sampling for propagating epistemic and aleatory uncertainty in dynamic event tree analysis
Rahman, S., Karanki, D. R., Epiney, A., Wicaksono, D., Zerkak, O., & Dang, V. N. (2018). Deterministic sampling for propagating epistemic and aleatory uncertainty in dynamic event tree analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 175, 62-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.03.009
Generation and evaluation of an artificial optical signal based on X-ray measurements for bubble characterization in fluidized beds with vertical internals
Schillinger, F., Schildhauer, T. J., Maurer, S., Wagner, E., Mudde, R. F., & van Ommen, J. R. (2018). Generation and evaluation of an artificial optical signal based on X-ray measurements for bubble characterization in fluidized beds with vertical internals. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 107, 16-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2018.03.002
Validating a Monte Carlo approach to absolute dose quality assurance for proton pencil beam scanning
Winterhalter, C., Fura, E., Tian, Y., Aitkenhead, A., Bolsi, A., Dieterle, M., … Safai, S. (2018). Validating a Monte Carlo approach to absolute dose quality assurance for proton pencil beam scanning. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 63(17), 175001 (12 pp.). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aad3ae
Epistemic and aleatory uncertainties in integrated deterministic and probabilistic safety assessment: tradeoff between accuracy and accident simulations
Karanki, D. R., Rahman, S., Dang, V. N., & Zerkak, O. (2017). Epistemic and aleatory uncertainties in integrated deterministic and probabilistic safety assessment: tradeoff between accuracy and accident simulations. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 162, 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.01.015
Validation of Geant4 pixel detector simulation framework by measurements with the Medipix family detectors
Krapohl, D., Schübel, A., Fröjdh, E., Thungström, G., & Fröjdh, C. (2016). Validation of Geant4 pixel detector simulation framework by measurements with the Medipix family detectors. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 63(3), 1874-1881. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2016.2555958
Exploring stochastic sampling in nuclear data uncertainties assessment for reactor physics applications and validation studies
Vasiliev, A., Rochman, D. I., Pecchia, M., & Ferroukhi, H. (2016). Exploring stochastic sampling in nuclear data uncertainties assessment for reactor physics applications and validation studies. Energies, 9(12), 1039 (18 pp.). https://doi.org/10.3390/en9121039
Characterizing a proton beam scanning system for Monte Carlo dose calculation in patients
Grassberger, C., Lomax, A., & Paganetti, H. (2015). Characterizing a proton beam scanning system for Monte Carlo dose calculation in patients. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 60(2), 633-645. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/60/2/633
Uncertainty propagation in Dynamic Event Trees - initial results for a modified tank problem
Karanki, D. R., Dang, V. N., & MacMillan, M. T. (2014). Uncertainty propagation in Dynamic Event Trees - initial results for a modified tank problem. In Vol. 8. Proceedings of the probabilistic safety assessment and management (PSAM) 12 conference (pp. 306-319).
Secondary radiation in transmission-type X-ray tubes: simulation, practical issues and solution in the context of X-ray microtomography
Boone, M. N., Vlassenbroeck, J., Peetermans, S., Van Loo, D., Dierick, M., & Van Hoorebeke, L. (2012). Secondary radiation in transmission-type X-ray tubes: simulation, practical issues and solution in the context of X-ray microtomography. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 661(1), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2011.09.046
In-gantry or remote patient positioning? Monte Carlo simulations for proton therapy centers of different sizes
Fava, G., Widesott, L., Fellin, F., Amichetti, M., Viesi, V., Lomax, A. J., … Schwarz, M. (2012). In-gantry or remote patient positioning? Monte Carlo simulations for proton therapy centers of different sizes. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 103(1), 18-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2011.11.004
Monte Carlo simulation of the bubble size distribution in a fluidized bed with intrusive probes
Rüdisüli, M., Schildhauer, T. J., Biollaz, S. M. A., & van Ommen, J. R. (2012). Monte Carlo simulation of the bubble size distribution in a fluidized bed with intrusive probes. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 44, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2012.03.009
Uncertainty analysis in PSA with correlated input parameters
Karanki, D. R., Jadhav, P. A., Chandrakar, A., Srividya, A., & Verma, A. K. (2010). Uncertainty analysis in PSA with correlated input parameters. International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management, 1(1), 66-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-010-0012-y