In recent years, new settlement mapping products have become available at the global and continental scale. Although accuracy assessments have indicated the high quality of these products, assessments were performed mainly on urban areas. However, there is also a need to monitor rural settlement development, as it is often located in proximity to biodiversity hotspots. In this paper, we verified the suitability of three settlement products (i.e., Global Urban Footprint - GUF, European Settlement Map - ESM and Open Street Map - OSM) to detect rural settlements in the Carpathian ecoregion. Two independent accuracy assessments indicated that the GUF captures rural settlements most effectively (overall accuracy - OA - 65.4% and 92.5% depending on the procedure). In contrast, the ESM overestimated settlements (OA - 49.5% and 90.8%), while the OSM (OA - 61.2% and 90.2%) was the most inconsistent source of settlement data. A regional comparison indicated some deviations from these accuracies, reflecting the variability of settlement structures within the study area. This study highlights that although the GUF was the best-performing product in mapping rural settlements across the whole study area, the settlement information it provided was rather conservative, and rural settlements are still insufficiently represented in all tested datasets.